On December 19, Senator Reid released his Manager's amendment to the health care reform legislation currently being discussed in the U.S. Senate. One provision in the amendment involved the $6.7 billion annual tax that will be levied on the health insurance industry. As the Congressional Budget Office has stated, this tax will get passed on to consumers through higher premiums. In his amendment, Senator Reid put forth that non-profit health insurance companies will be exempt from this tax -- in essence leaving for-profit plans, and their members, to shoulder the entire tax burden.
What does this mean to the nearly 91 percent (5,285,472) of Georgians that have health insurance provided by for-profit companies?
It means Georgia's share of the $6.7 billion tax will increase. It will directly impact Georgia's insured population and will cause premium amounts to increase even more under this legislation. Because a greater percentage of Georgians are insured by for-profit companies (91 percent) than the national average (55 percent), Georgia taxpayers will subsidize states like Michigan, which has a very low enrollment in for-profit health insurers (23 percent).
Any proposal to tax only for-profit health plans will further exacerbate the un-level playing field for not-for-profit plans, without improving access to health benefits coverage or enhanced health services. While some plans are not-for-profit, that does not mean they are not "profitable." Insurers are required to generate a "net income" in order to help ensure they can pay future claims by members. Not-for-profit simply reflects a tax status under the Internal Revenue Service Code. In many states, the net income on a per-member, per-month (PMPM) basis for not-for-profit health plans is actually higher than that of the for-profit health plans.
Over time, un-equal taxation will lead to the erosion and potential insolvency of for-profit plans, as a progressively smaller share of the overall market would bear the burden of sustaining the entire amount of the tax. Ultimately the government would receive no revenue from the tax when there are no for-profit entities remaining subject to the tax.
-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Showing posts with label amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label amendment. Show all posts
Monday, December 21, 2009
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
Save Flexible Spending Plans Applauds Amendment to Protect Flexible Spending Accounts
/PRNewswire/ -- Save Flexible Spending Plans, a national grassroots organization dedicated to protecting flexible spending accounts (FSAs), praised Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) for filing an amendment to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that would help protect the future use and value of FSAs. The amendment, filed yesterday afternoon, would adjust for inflation the currently pending $2,500 cap on FSAs, helping to ensure that participants will be able to meet their out-of-pocket health care needs over time.
"We are encouraged that Sen. Schumer filed an amendment to protect FSAs, a benefit relied upon by more than 35 million working American families to manage and hold down their health care costs," said Joe Jackson, chairman of Save Flexible Spending Plans and CEO of WageWorks Inc., a benefits company based in San Mateo, CA. "Without indexing the $2,500 contribution cap for inflation, millions of participants, including those battling chronic illnesses, will see the value of their FSAs quickly erode. The Schumer amendment would solve this problem, ensuring that access to FSAs stays in line with increasing costs. Filing of the amendment further acknowledges the importance and support in the Senate for preserving FSAs as a valuable cost-saving benefit."
Failing to adjust the contribution cap for inflation, as had been crafted in legislation passed by the House of Representatives, will cause the value of a $2,500 FSA to plummet to less than half its worth within a decade.
"Following the September introduction of Sen. Baucus' (D-MT) health care reform legislation, Senate Finance Committee members from both parties offered amendments to protect FSAs," added Jackson. "We are hopeful that once again, Senators from both sides of the aisle will sign on in support of the Schumer amendment and his solution that is critical to protecting FSAs."
Beyond the need to adjust the contribution cap for inflation, there are still concerns about the unreasonably low amount of the cap, which has been proposed. The restrictions will force approximately 7 million hard-working Americans who use their FSAs to pay for out-of-pocket health care expenses greater than $2,500 to pay higher taxes and health care costs. Federal employees who currently enjoy a $5,000 limit on FSA contributions will see their access to FSAs cut in half. Additionally, state employees in 46 states who currently have FSA contribution limits set at $3,000 or more will be negatively impacted. Sadly, those with the highest out-of-pocket health care costs - the sickest - will be hit the hardest by restrictions on FSA use.
-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter: @GAFrontPage
"We are encouraged that Sen. Schumer filed an amendment to protect FSAs, a benefit relied upon by more than 35 million working American families to manage and hold down their health care costs," said Joe Jackson, chairman of Save Flexible Spending Plans and CEO of WageWorks Inc., a benefits company based in San Mateo, CA. "Without indexing the $2,500 contribution cap for inflation, millions of participants, including those battling chronic illnesses, will see the value of their FSAs quickly erode. The Schumer amendment would solve this problem, ensuring that access to FSAs stays in line with increasing costs. Filing of the amendment further acknowledges the importance and support in the Senate for preserving FSAs as a valuable cost-saving benefit."
Failing to adjust the contribution cap for inflation, as had been crafted in legislation passed by the House of Representatives, will cause the value of a $2,500 FSA to plummet to less than half its worth within a decade.
"Following the September introduction of Sen. Baucus' (D-MT) health care reform legislation, Senate Finance Committee members from both parties offered amendments to protect FSAs," added Jackson. "We are hopeful that once again, Senators from both sides of the aisle will sign on in support of the Schumer amendment and his solution that is critical to protecting FSAs."
Beyond the need to adjust the contribution cap for inflation, there are still concerns about the unreasonably low amount of the cap, which has been proposed. The restrictions will force approximately 7 million hard-working Americans who use their FSAs to pay for out-of-pocket health care expenses greater than $2,500 to pay higher taxes and health care costs. Federal employees who currently enjoy a $5,000 limit on FSA contributions will see their access to FSAs cut in half. Additionally, state employees in 46 states who currently have FSA contribution limits set at $3,000 or more will be negatively impacted. Sadly, those with the highest out-of-pocket health care costs - the sickest - will be hit the hardest by restrictions on FSA use.
-----
www.fayettefrontpage.com
Fayette Front Page
www.georgiafrontpage.com
Georgia Front Page
Follow us on Twitter: @GAFrontPage
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)